What type of official is most likely to claim Absolute Immunity?

Judges are most likely to claim Absolute Immunity because this legal protection allows them to perform their judicial functions without the fear of being sued for their decisions or actions taken in the course of their work. This doctrine is based on the principle that judicial officers need independence to make impartial decisions based on the law, and if they were subject to civil liability, their ability to function effectively could be impaired. Absolute Immunity is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the judicial process, allowing judges to uphold justice without concern for personal repercussions from their rulings.

In contrast, traffic officers, city councillors, and administrative staff typically do not have the same level of immunity. They may operate under qualified immunity or face varying degrees of liability depending on their actions, the context of their duties, and the consequences of those actions. This differentiation further underscores the unique position judges hold within the legal system, reinforcing the necessity of Absolute Immunity to protect judicial independence and the rule of law.